z-kolkiemz-kolkiem

Could scientists help your approach to investing?

With scientific research making headlines, Rebecca Cretney and Simon Prescott explore how scientists’ approach to patient care could be applied to the approach investors take to select portfolios.
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email
Published 31 March
6½ mins

Throughout the COVID-19 crisis, we have been told to trust in the scientists’ data that underpins the decisions being made by governments around the world. But can the same approach be applied to investing? Rebecca Cretney and Simon Prescott answered our questions as to why they believe there is a parallel between scientists’ approach to patient care and how investors build portfolios.

How did your conversation about a potential parallel begin?

Simon: It began due to a Forbes article I read about a book called the One Page Financial Plan, by a US-based adviser called Carl Richards. In it, he details that he was discussing investments with a friend and medical practitioner who stated: “If I practiced medicine the way I invest, I would have killed half my patients.” It’s a quote Richards liked a lot and now many more do too – including me.

Essentially, the analogy sets out that, as a scientist, Richards’ friend would study peer-reviewed studies to gain confidence that he was making the right choice about a patient’s treatment, ahead of prescribing anything. The same physician, however, flagged that he failed to follow that logic when investing. Instead, he’d still seek out recommendations from friends, read the newspapers and make a decision based on a ‘gut feeling’ as to whether to buy or sell. His approach to investing didn’t involve doing any research, despite his professional reliance on it. You could argue his approach to investing was the medical equivalent of self-medicating after a couple of minutes on a search engine to determine the cause of an ailment. 

Rebecca: And this chimed with me due to a recent article I had read in the Financial Times (FT) that argued that “most” portfolio profits result from the outperformance of “a tiny number of superstar companies” that should never be sold – advice which was predicated on a series of examples that highlighted the additional gains investors would have made if they had followed the ‘sage’ advice of not selling holdings too soon. The argument had been based on a research paper that had been published (and republished with updated data), but which was subsequently condemned by peers, not least as the paper had admitted – albeit only in a footnote – that its theory was flawed if your investment portfolio was well diversified.

So it’s not just research, but research that has been scrutinised that is important…

Rebecca: With some much information available, it’s easy to find a piece of research that confirms your point of view. Called confirmation bias, it sets out that investors pay attention to the evidence that proves their point to the extent that they ignore any research that doesn’t validate their theory. In the case of the FT article, readers were drawn to the simple conclusion that “the upside of not selling is nearly unlimited” and were provided with reasons to believe. However, a more experienced investor will be able to cite lots of examples where that hasn’t happened. Ask anyone that invested in stocks such as Blackberry, Eastman Kodak, or any of the oil companies, and ignored the research providing the reasons to sell. And you only have to look at the leading stocks in today’s FTSE 100 or S&P 500 versus 20 years ago to see this is often the case.

There will, in truth, always be examples of investments that were sold, typically to realise (substantial) profits, but that continued to climb higher and post further gains over the following months, or sometimes even years. The only way of knowing though which stocks you shouldn’t have sold is through hindsight. As such, profit taking is always a sensible answer if you have seen some stellar returns and have concerns over the stock’s future.

Simon: This has been proven time and time again as the value of investments falls, as well as increases, given the economic cycle changes, existing technology is replaced by new advances and – just like anything else – some stock selections are based on fashion. In the last five years, for example, value investing has struggled with many turning their back on the approach, only to see value stocks outperform in the first three months of 2021 as the investment style become acceptable again.

What other theories has research debunked?

Rebecca: Another approach to investing that research shows to be flawed is that stocks should be only held for a very short period before being flipped. While there is significant research explaining why, it’s probably easier to illustrate the point by citing Warren Buffet, who stated: “If you aren’t thinking about owning a stock for ten years, don’t even think about owning it for ten minutes.”

This is because picking the low and high points of a stock’s value is notoriously difficult, as our colleague James explained in this article. Even if you were satisfied buying ’close’ to the bottom and/or selling ’almost’ at the top, it’s actually still difficult to earn a living over a short timeframe, let alone a longer one. This is because it would see you investing too much in too few stocks – and the benefits of diversification have been proven in research since 1952. It would also take you a considerable amount of time to pick more than a handful of stocks – even without any research. And a lot of any profit would be spent on trading fees.

Simon: Another piece of research we often highlight as flawed is that people should invest in stocks that are familiar to them, which, incidentally, often employs another of Warren Buffet’s famous quotes as part of its evidence. It argues that investors should stick to buying simple businesses that they understand. Again, examples are used, such as Nortel and Enron, to deter investors from seeking out the shares of companies with complex product lines. However, the issue here is that what is simple to an investor is often very familiar and this, in turn, typically leads to a home bias in his/her investment portfolio. Generally, people invest significantly more in their home market than its share of global market capitalisation justifies. And while there is the argument that this protects against currency risk, there are some very efficient tools that can be used to mitigate this risk. In addition, some currency diversification might be advisable if your income, property, business interests and other assets are already denominated in one local currency.

So what research do you back?

Simon: There isn’t one sole piece of research that underpins every single investment decision we, as a firm, make. Instead, it’s a combination of experience (based on real time knowledge of market movements), research from multiple third-party sources, as well as our own analysis. And, as a professional wealth manager, we have access to significant levels of all of these types of information to provide well balanced advice to all of our clients.

Rebecca: To close the loop, it’s worth highlighting that Richards’ scientist would quickly realise that doing research to underpin his investment decisions is never going to be a valuable use of his time. After all, many of the reasons he has access to the right medical research are due to his job. And the same is true of investing. So, perhaps, the only piece of research he really needed to do was to understand which professional wealth manager to select in order to tailor a portfolio designed to meet his goals and aspirations. After all, medical treatment is tailored to the patient as is investment advice to individuals. This would ensure that his investments stood the same chance of a successful outcome as his patients expected.

Clients of Nedbank Private Wealth can get in touch with their private banker directly to understand how their portfolios are responding to market events, or call +44 (0)1624 645000 to speak to our client services team.

 

If you would like to find out more about how we manage clients’ investments, please contact us on the same number as above. Or you can get in touch using the links to the forms towards the end of this page.

The value of investments can fall, as well as rise, and you might not get back the original amount invested. Exchange rate changes affect the value of investments. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future returns. Any individual investment or security mentioned may be included in clients’ portfolios and is referenced for illustrative purposes only, not as a recommendation, not least as it may not be suitable. You should always seek professional advice before making any investment decisions.

about the authors

Rebecca Cretney

Rebecca Cretney

Rebecca joined Nedbank Private Wealth in May 2004 having moved to the Isle of Man from Barcelona to pursue a course in Business Studies with the Isle of Man Business School. Rebecca was appointed to the role of investment counsellor in March 2019 to focus exclusively on the company’s discretionary investment management services.

 

She works closely with our teams of private bankers to provide support in advising our clients with integrity, and to give additional technical investment expertise where more complex portfolio requirements exist.

 

Rebecca is a Chartered Fellow of the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment and a Chartered Wealth Manager.

Simon Prescott

Simon Prescott

Simon’s role is to work with our UK and international clients, and their families, to help them structure their investments and other financial assets to achieve their goals and aspirations, through the development of bespoke wealth plans. The planning process starts with an assessment of clients’ current finances, before developing individual scenarios using cashflow modelling. The plans are then regularly reviewed in the context of clients’ changing lives to ensure they remain on track to see their plans come to fruition.

 

His appointment followed the establishment of bank’s wealth planning function, where he was instrumental in its design, build and implementation. Simon has over 20 years’ experience of delivering investment and planning advice. He has worked for Nedbank Private Wealth since 2007, when he started with the firm as a private banker.

 

Simon holds the Level 7 Diploma in Advanced Financial Planning the highest financial planning qualification in the UK, is a Chartered Wealth Manager and a Chartered Fellow of the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment.

Access more of our insights

Investing

The week in review

3 Aug

   |   5 mins

In a review of the week of 26 July, some economies showed signs of recovery but emerging markets remain hindered by the continued spread of the COVID-19 Delta variant, the speed of their vaccine rollouts and China’s regulatory crackdown.

Investing

The week in review

26 Jul

   |   2 mins

In a review of the week of 19 July, we flag the new developments in financial markets, which continued to be dominated by the same reoccurring themes of inflation, central banks’ intervention and the spread of the COVID-19 Delta variant.

Investing

The week in review

20 Jul

   |   2 mins

We review the week starting 12 July, which saw markets slip back from recent highs amid continued concerns over the spread of the COVID-19 Delta variant. Meanwhile, the debate carries on about how transitory inflation might be.

Investing

Democracy, pineapples and semiconductors

20 Jul

   |   8 mins

As the semiconductor industry saw a global shortage the relationship between China and the US got tenser, particularly with regard to Taiwan. Karen Bennett and Rebecca Cretney highlight what’s going on and what investors should be aware of.

Get in touch

If you are interested in becoming a client, please complete the form via the ‘become a client’ button below. Alternatively, if you are already a client, or if you have a question about how we help clients in particular circumstances, please use the ‘contact us’ button.

 

We will get back to you as soon as we can during office hours, which are Monday to Friday, 8am to 8pm (UK time), except for UK public holidays.

Become a Client

Thank you for your interest in Nedbank Private Wealth. Please call us on +44 (0)1624 645000 or complete the requested information and one of our team will get back to you soon. We look forward to speaking with you.  Please note: If you are an EU resident, we are unfortunately unable to offer our services to you at present.

* Required fields

Contact Us

Give us a call today on +44 (0)1624 645000 or please complete the requested information and one of our team will get back to you soon. We look forward to speaking with you.

Our office hours are weekdays from 8am to 8pm UK time, except for UK public holidays.

* Required field

Search suggestions

IMPORTANT

Beware of scams using Nedbank Private Wealth’s name.

 

Have you received an email or SMS claiming to be from Nedbank Private Wealth, inviting you to open an account?

 

Don’t be tricked – Nedbank Private Wealth never contacts members of the public directly, and will never use email or text messages to ask you for your bank details or sensitive personal information.

 

We are aware of scams using our name and those of our staff. These are usually intended to convince you to send money to the scammers, who use our name because it sounds legitimate.

 

If you are in any doubt about whether an email or SMS in our name is legitimate, please speak to your private banker, or call the telephone numbers on the “Contact us” page.